1. Half in scale and half in feather
2. Hald developed wings
Take a look at the legs of a bird. Scaled. And look at the wings of an ostrich. They are not "half-formed" (whatever that means) but they certainly don't allow the ostrich to fly.
No. Even Archaeopteryx has fully formed feathers and wings, not half & half. Anyway feathers are more closely related to hair than scales.
Other fossils were thought to have evidence of "proto feathers" but this is disputed and it now seems these were actually decaying collagen fibres.
This is interesting because it is a prediction of Darwinian evolution that there should be many incremental steps between the examples you give.
If you want to argue against a theory, the correct way to do it is find a prediction that the theory makes that does not match reality.
The incorrect way to do it is make up ridiculous horseshit that has nothing at all to do with the theory, pretend that the theory makes these idiotic predictions, and then claim victory. This method is just a massive waste of everyone's time.
The answer is "yes," scientist does have found transitional form. Archaeopteryx, which most authorities now consider to have been a dinosaur, had both scales and feathers, as do modern birds. Certain maniraptoran theropod dinosaurs had heavily feathered front limbs with a bone structure essentially identical to that of birds. I hopes that you finds these answer satisfactory.
Does scientist have found transitional form:
1. Half in scale and half in feather
2. Hald developed wings
